Skip to Content

July 2009

New ambush near world's largest gold mine; 2 dead (AP)

JAKARTA, Indonesia – Gunmen opened fire Wednesday on buses carrying employees of U.S. mining company Freeport in Indonesia's impoverished Papua province, killing two people in the latest attack on the world's largest gold mine, witnesses and the state news agency said.
The state news agency Antara reported two dead, but it did not identify the victims or say if they were shot.
An Associated Press reporter was told by a policeman who witnessed the shooting that a police vehicle escorting the convoy flipped. He declined to be named because he was not authorized to talk to the media.
Several injured officers were taken to a local clinic, the AP reporter said, one of them in critical condition. Two body bags were later seen being removed. The police officer did not think any Freeport employees had been hurt.
Since July 11, at least a dozen people have been killed or wounded in ambushes along a road leading to the mine, prompting a massive security operation in the militarized zone that is off limits to foreign journalists.
Freeport declined comment, referring inquiries to police who did not return phone calls.
Arizona-based Freeport has been targeted with arson, roadside bombs and blockades since production began in the 1970s during the U.S.-backed Suharto dictatorship.
Freeport CEO Richard Adkerson said Tuesday that 15 arrests had been made in connection with the shootings in which a Freeport guard, an Australian mining expert and a policeman died. He said six people had been charged, including a man who apparently acknowledged being a sniper.
"We have been assured from the highest levels of government in Indonesia they are committed to provide safety for our people and for our operations," Adkerson said in a conference call detailing their latest earnings.
Freeport staff were ordered to stop traveling the road last week, and hundreds have been unable to return to work. The buses were turned back when the firing began, Antara reported.
A PT Freeport spokesman in Indonesia, Mindo Pangaribuan, said early Wednesday morning that "secure transportations have been arranged to transport personnel and deliver supplies."
Papua is home to a four-decade-old, low-level insurgency against the government, and members of the Free Papua Movement — who see Freeport as a symbol of outside rule — were initially blamed by authorities for the latest violence.
Some analysts, however, believe the shootings resulted from a rivalry between the police and military over multimillion dollar illegal gold mining or protection businesses at the mine. Others blame criminal gangs.
The shootings were the worst violence at Freeport since the killing of three schoolteachers, including two Americans, in August 2002 that sparked widespread protests by locals who feel they are not benefiting from the depletion of Papua's natural resources.
Freeport employs about 20,000 people in Papua, where it has extracted billions of dollars worth of gold and copper and still has some of the largest reserves in the world. Freeport is one of the top taxpayers to the Indonesian government, which is also a minority stake holder.
Papua, a desperately poor mountain province, lies on the western half of New Guinea island, some 2,100 miles (3,400 kilometers) east of the capital, Jakarta.

Afghanistan moves troops to south, clashes in north (Reuters)

KABUL (Reuters) –
Afghanistan is repositioning forces to the south after complaints too few are involved in major U.S. and British offensives against the Taliban, officials said on Wednesday, even as clashes erupted in the north.

Afghan troops battled a group of Taliban fighters dug into a valley in northern Kunduz on Wednesday, Defense Ministry spokesman Zaher Azimi said. He said fighters loyal to a wanted al Qaeda-linked Uzbek leader had entered the north recently.

With violence this year hitting its highest levels since the overthrow of the Taliban in 2001, thousands of U.S. Marines and British troops launched assaults in the southern Taliban stronghold of Helmand this month.

The new offensives are the first major operations under U.S. President Barack Obama's new regional strategy to defeat the Taliban and its militant Islamist allies and stabilize Afghanistan, which holds a presidential election on August 20.

The aim of the operations in Helmand is to clear the vast province of insurgents and hold the ground it wins, something overstretched NATO forces have so far been unable to do.

But the offensives underscored weaknesses in the Afghan security forces, with only about 650 fighting alongside some 4,000 U.S. Marines and a similar number of British troops in Helmand, which produces most of the opium that funds the Taliban-led insurgency.

Brigadier General Lawrence Nicholson, commander of U.S. Marines in Afghanistan, complained about a week after Operation Strike of the Sword began in Helmand that there were not enough Afghan troops involved. "You can do the math," he said.

He said many more were needed to build relations with local leaders, a major part of a new counter-insurgency strategy under General Stanley McChrystal, commander of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, and identify Taliban members hiding among residents.

Azimi blamed the media for complaints about the paucity of Afghan troops fighting in Helmand and said security forces were stretched to their limit combating insurgents across the country.

He said an extra battalion of about 700 troops was being sent to join the fight in Helmand. Afghanistan already has more than 5,000 troops in the province, he said.

"We are sending an extra battalion to Helmand, it is en route and, with its arrival, the number of Afghan forces will exceed 6,000 in Helmand," Azimi told a media conference.

ATTACKS CLIMB SHARPLY

Afghanistan's army totals about 95,000 troops, with the number to increase by about 5,000 by year's end.

The United States has about 58,000 troops in Afghanistan, with another 39,000 from NATO and other non-U.S. coalition members bringing the total of foreign forces to about 97,000.

Washington plans to increase its troop levels to 68,000 by year's end, more than double the 32,000 at the end of 2008.

Nicholson has said there were also problems with the quality of Afghan police units. Under Obama's new strategy, 4,000 more troops are also being sent to train Afghan security forces.

Violence has spiked across the country since the operations in Helmand began, with attacks against the military and civilians climbing sharply.

U.S. and British troops in Helmand and elsewhere have so far borne the brunt of the Taliban backlash. Record death tolls have prompted questions in London and Washington about strategies in Afghanistan and how long troops should remain.

In Berlin, German Defense Minister Franz Josef Jung said about 300 German soldiers had joined a week-long offensive against the Taliban around Kunduz, their biggest operation to date, in a bid to improve security before the election.

Azimi said Afghan troops had besieged a group of insurgents entrenched in Char Dara, a valley in Kunduz, on Wednesday, part of wider operations against militants. He said 13 Taliban fighters and four soldiers had been killed.

Afghanistan's north has generally been regarded as more peaceful than the Taliban strongholds in the south and east but there has been a spate of attacks against foreign and Afghan forces in recent weeks.

Azimi said the increase in Taliban attacks in the north was partly in response to an agreement reached in Moscow this month to allow Washington to fly troops and supplies for Afghanistan across its territory, opening an important northern supply route.

It also followed the announcement a month ago of an escalation of operations by Pakistan's army against insurgents in the tribal areas of Waziristan, he said.

Azimi said fighters loyal to Tahir Yuldash and other insurgents had also moved into the north to disrupt the August presidential poll. Yuldash and his Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan fighters were given shelter by the Taliban before 2001.

(Additional reporting by Erik Kirschbaum in BERLIN; Editing by Paul Tait)

House Money: Democrats Dominate (CQPolitics.com)

The campaign arm of the House Democrats raised $7.2 million in June, more than doubling the amount raised by its Republican counterpart committee.

In a filing Monday with the Federal Election Commission, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee also said that it had raised $30.8 million in the first six months of 2009, compared with $17.5 million raised by the National Republican Congressional Committee.

In the poor economic climate, both House campaign committees raised less during the first half of 2009 than they did during the first half of 2007.

The DCCC raised about $6 million less than it did during the first six months of 2007, though it raised about $7 million more than it did during the first half of 2005.

With just 178 seats in the 435-member House, Republicans' fundraising has sharply declined. The NRCC raised $40 million in the first half of 2005 -- when the GOP still controlled the House -- and $29.5 million in the first half of 2007, the year Democrats moved back to the majority.

The DCCC in June raised twice as much in large itemized donations as it did in small unitemized donations. Forty DCCC donors gave the annual maximum of $30,400, including eight employees of Paloma Partners, a holding company based in Greenwich, Connecticut.

Alonzo Mourning, a former professional basketball player, also gave $30,400 to the DCCC last month.

Six individuals donated the maximum to the NRCC last month, including Ronald Weiser, who heads the Michigan Republican Party and previously served as President George W. Bush's ambassador to the Slovak Republic.

The DCCC collected $2.1 million from its membership in June, with 19 House Democrats transferring at least $50,000 to the political committee. Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California and Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer of Maryland were among the four House Democrats who transferred $100,000 last month to the DCCC.

The only House Republican to send at least $50,000 to the NRCC was Frank D. Lucas of Oklahoma.

Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC)

- Receipts, June 2009: $7.2 million

- Receipts, Year-to-date: $30.8 million

- Disbursements, June 2009: $2.4 million

- Disbursements, Year-to-date: $21.6 million

- Cash-on-hand, June 30: $9.7 million

- Debts, June 30: $6 million

Notable transfers from campaign committees of House Democrats

- Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California: $100,000

- Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer of Maryland: $100,000

- Michael M. Honda of California: $100,000

- Xavier Becerra of California: $100,000

- Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank of Massachusetts: $75,000

- Jan Schakowsky of Illinois: $60,000

- Edward J. Markey of Massachusetts: $50,000

- Former Rep. Robert E. "Bud" Cramer of Alabama: $50,000

- Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry A. Waxman of California: $50,000

- Henry Cuellar of Texas: $50,000

- Zoe Lofgren of California: $50,000

- Richard E. Neal of Massachusetts: $50,000

- Rick Boucher of Virginia: $50,000

- Anna G. Eshoo of California: $50,000

- Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles B. Rangel of New York: $50,000

- Budget Committee Chairman John M. Spratt Jr.: $50,000

- Democratic Caucus Chairman John B. Larson of Connecticut: $50,000

- Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut: $50,000

- Adam B. Schiff of California: $50,000

National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC)

- Receipts, June 2009: $3.1 million

- Receipts, Year-to-date: $17.5 million

- Disbursements, June 2009: $2.7 million

- Disbursements, Year-to-date: $14.2 million

- Cash-on-hand, June 30: $4.2 million

- Debts, June 30: $3.25 million

Notable transfers from campaign committees of House Republicans

- Frank D. Lucas of Oklahoma: $50,000

- Kay Granger of Texas: $30,000

- K. Michael Conaway of Texas: $30,000

- John Kline of Minnesota: $28,000

- Harold Rogers of Kentucky: $27,000

- Howard Coble of North Carolina: $25,000

Michael Jackson aimed to direct movie about foster children (Reuters)

LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) –
Three months before his death, Michael Jackson committed to co-directing and financing a movie -- a poignant drama about foster children -- and planned to get started as soon as he completed his London concerts.

The news is the latest in a series of revelations that are helping to shed light on the pop star's passions and projects, even as the investigation into his abuse of prescription drugs and a tussle over custody of his children rage on.

The movie project also is eerily keyed to one of the most haunting aspects of Jackson's life: his apparent feeling that the Jackson 5's huge success robbed him of his childhood.

"He was very excited about making movies and wanted his hands on everything, from working on screenplays to producing, to writing the music. However, he never showed any interest in acting," B-movie producer, writer and director Bryan Michael Stoller said of Jackson, who starred in the 1978 pic "The Wiz."

Stoller said he had a 23-year friendship with the pop star and was his partner in the film company Magic Shadows. He was to have co-directed the movie, called "They Cage the Animals at Night," which Stoller said they had been developing for seven years.

INSPIRED BY BOOK

The project was based on a 1985 book about the real-life experiences of author Jennings Michael Burch, who bounced around foster homes as a child. Jackson showed the book to Stoller in 2002 at his Neverland estate and asked if he wanted to produce and co-direct a movie version.

"Michael told me often he felt like he grew up as an orphan, like a foster kid, because he never was in one home," Stoller said. "To him every hotel was like a different foster home. He said he used to sit in the window and see kids playing outside and cry because he couldn't be part of that."

Stoller optioned the book for $1 -- initially without telling Burch about Jackson's involvement. When he did tell him, Stoller said the author was excited to work with the singer.

Jackson, meanwhile, was concerned that Burch, then 67 and suffering from cancer, might not survive to see the movie made. So Stoller suggested bringing Burch to Neverland in 2003, where Jackson turned the tables and interviewed him for what was to be a TV special and for the eventual DVD.

During their highly charged conversation, Jackson asked the author if he had ever considered suicide. Burch said he had, and Jackson said he too had considered it during his darkest days. (A clip from this footage is available at THR.com.)

Stoller recorded their meeting, an addition to a collection of videos he made with Jackson over the years, and to hours of audio recordings from their meetings.

Stoller told The Hollywood Reporter he has now come forward because he believes this material humanizes his friend at a time when much myth-making about Jackson is taking place. The producer also is marketing his video, audio and photos either for outright sale or as a project he would produce and direct.

He said he already has had interest from NBC, CBS and E!

But insiders in the Jackson camp said there was no formal deal in place for any Jackson involvement in "Cage"; discussions between the artist and Stoller occurred when Jackson was without management, which may have frowned on any distractions as he prepared for the London shows.

'CAST AWAY' CAST OFF

Jackson's last film foray was a 2005 comedic farce, "Miss Cast Away and the Island Girls," produced, written and directed by Stoller and starring Eric Roberts. Jackson is briefly in the movie as Agent M.J., who comes to the rescue of various characters on a beam of light. The movie was a direct-to-DVD release sold briefly at Blockbuster stores.

When Jackson was indicted on child molestation charges shortly after its release, Blockbuster pulled the film from its shelves. "Miss Cast Away" has been sold overseas by Showcase Entertainment, and Stoller said he has offers for a new domestic video release for Jackson's last movie appearance.

"They Cage the Animals" also was affected by the molestation charges, Stoller said. In 2003 the producer arranged a three-hour meeting in a Universal City hotel between Jackson and Mel Gibson, who besides being an actor is a producer and partner in Icon Prods. "They got along great," Stoller said. "It was kind of funny. Mel was a little nervous. He was hugging a pillow the whole time, kind of playing with it. Michael was kind of shy."

Icon signed a deal to develop the project with a budget of $12 million-$20 million, according to Stoller, who was paid by Icon to write the screenplay. A couple of months later, when Jackson was indicted in Santa Barbara, Calif., Icon dropped the project, and Gibson stopped returning Stoller's phone calls. There were news reports in 2005 that Icon had dropped the project. A spokesman for Icon said the company briefly was involved in developing it in 1995 but had lost interest by 1997. Stoller has a copy of his contract with Icon dated 2002.

Stoller said Icon still owns the screenplay, but an Icon representative rebutted that, saying the company has had no involvement or ownership for 10 years. Gibson declined comment for this report.

WATCHING MOVIES

Jackson lost contact with Stoller for about two years during the period when the singer was on trial. But after his acquittal, Jackson reached out to him. They had watched dozens of movies in the Neverland theater; Stoller said Jackson's favorite was "To Kill a Mockingbird," and that they also discussed doing a remake of the comedy musical "Chitty Chitty Bang Bang."

"When Jackson called in 2007, he still had movies on his mind," Stoller said. "He had begun to purchase movie production equipment. He was always asking how things work, but I never saw him really work things. But he wanted all the toys. He bought a dolly and wanted me to show the kids how to use it because they were using it as a play toy, riding around on it."

Jackson wasn't interested in making a blockbuster. "He wanted to do movies the Academy would like," Stoller recalled.

Three months before Jackson's death, he and Stoller had "a pretty serious meeting" about reviving "They Cage the Animals" as an indie feature, the producer said.

"Michael was going to put up $8 million and not have to deal with any studios or producers and then take it to the studios afterward," Stoller said. "He was very passionate about being a director. He was determined to make this movie."

(Editing by SheriLinden at Reuters)

Calif. university system OKs 20 percent fee hike (AP)

LONG BEACH, Calif. – The California State University system raised student fees Tuesday by 20 percent as part of a budget plan that would also shrink enrollment and furlough nearly all employees for two days a month.
The Board of Trustees voted 17-1 to raise undergraduate fees by $672 a year to $4,827 in the nation's largest four-year university system, which has about 450,000 students.
The fee increase, which follows a 10 percent hike approved in May, is part of the university's plan to close a $584 million budget shortfall caused by an unprecedented drop in state funding to the 23-campus system.
"We face a huge economic tsunami," board Chairman Jeffrey Bleich said. "What we're doing today doesn't give anyone pleasure."
The board voted for the hike despite protests from students who marched, chanted and banged drums outside the meeting hall in Long Beach.
Even with the increases, which begin this fall, undergraduate fees at CSU remain less than those at most comparable universities but more than twice the amount students paid seven years ago.
Fees also were raised $780 a year for teacher credential students, $828 a year for graduate students and $990 for nonresident undergraduates.
The increase is expected to generate $236 million, a third of which will be set aside for financial aid.
For many students, the increased fees will be offset by expanded financial aid and federal tax credits included in the $787 billion economic stimulus package, CSU officials said.
The state is expected to reduce funding for its two public university systems — CSU and the University of California — by 20 percent under a tentative budget deal reached Monday by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and legislative leaders to close a $26 billion deficit.
Last week, the UC Board of Regents approved a budget plan that would lead to deep funding cuts at its 10 campuses and force most employees to take furloughs and pay cuts ranging from 4 percent to 10 percent.
CSU, sometimes called the "People's University," has been one of the country's most affordable universities and has large numbers of low-income, minority students who are the first in their families to attend college.
Student protesters, who traveled to Long Beach from across California, said the fee hikes, enrollment reductions and program cuts would reduce access to the university.
"You're going to see the gentrification of the CSU and the door close to higher education for working-class people," said Aaron Buchbinder, 26, a graduate student in social work at San Francisco State University. "I'm going to pile up more debt, and it's going to take me longer to pay off."
Vanessa Rojas, a senior English major at CSU Bakersfield, said the budget cuts would lead to fewer course offerings, larger class sizes and longer graduation times.
"Fees are increasing, but the quality of education is going down," Rojas said.
Chancellor Charles B. Reed said the university has no attractive options for addressing its budget shortfall.
"All of our choices go from bad to worse," he said. "I want us to maintain quality and serve as many students as we can."

Under Reed's plan, all CSU employees except public safety officers would take unpaid leave two days a month and see their pay cut by about 10 percent. If all groups participate, the furloughs would begin Aug. 1 and save $275 million.

Reed set a July 28 deadline for employee unions to decide whether to take furloughs, which are intended to reduce layoffs and preserve health care and pension benefits.

The California State University Employees Union, which represents about 16,000 nonacademic workers, said its members have approved a furlough agreement.

The California Faculty Association, the largest union with 23,000 members, is expected to have results of its furlough vote Wednesday.

"You've got faculty out there who are struggling to live on the salaries they have right now," said Cecil Canton, a criminal justice professor at the Sacramento campus who joined the student demonstration Tuesday. "A 10 percent pay cut is going to make it more difficult."

Under Reed's budget plan, student enrollment would be reduced by 40,000 during the next two years. Earlier this month, the university closed admissions for the winter and spring 2010 terms.

In addition, the university system would need to cut a total of $183 million from individual campus budgets, which is expected to lead to staff layoffs, fewer course offerings and cuts to academic programs and student services.

"This is fundamentally changing the university," said Lillian Taiz, a history professor at CSU Los Angeles who heads the faculty union. "We're downsizing this university and really restricting opportunity for a whole generation of California students."

Obama's top five PR tricks (Politico)

He’s been in office only six months, but already there’s a strong sense of déjà vu around the way Americans are seeing and hearing from President Barack Obama.
The president keeps returning to the same communications tactics over and over, and all the pages of his PR playbook have one thing in common: a big dose of Obama.
His prime-time news conference Wednesday night, one of the standbys, brings his total to four. That’s the same number that George W. Bush did — in eight years as president.
But as Obama’s once-lofty approval ratings dip — and voters express skepticism over his plans for health care and the economy — the longevity of the White House’s go-to techniques is being put to the test. One challenge for Obama’s team in coming weeks: not overusing the president.
“They have to be careful about that,” said former Clinton press secretary Mike McCurry. “There are diminishing returns if you see the president too much. ... Part of this is just because he’s fascinating and popular right now. Inevitably, they’re going to hit some potholes, and they’re going to have to adjust their strategy.”
One troubling sign for the White House: TV networks were slow to sign on to Wednesday’s prime-time news conference. And Obama’s latest polls offer a strong reminder for the new White House that a president’s popularity is perishable — and time is ticking.
“They’ve got their eye on the expiration date, and they’re going to tap that well until it expires,” said former Bush press secretary Ari Fleischer. “And if they’re successful, the well gets replenished. And success means that cap and trade and health care reform get signed into law.”
White House press secretary Robert Gibbs dismissed the idea of Obama overload. “It’s important that the president continue to remind the American people what’s at stake,” Gibbs said Tuesday, when asked about Obama’s nine health care speeches in nine days. “I don’t think he can probably say that enough.”
Here’s a peek inside the playbook and the reasons why the White House keeps rinsing and repeating the same tactics:
The town-hall-style meeting
Call it Obama unplugged.
This has been one of Obama’s favorite ways to get his message out. Since taking office, he has held more than a dozen town halls in eight states, as well as one streaming live online from the White House and one in Strasbourg, France.
For the White House, the events play to Obama’s strengths. The crowds are adoring. He can give a speech laying out his message, unfiltered. And he can play Washington outsider for a few hours while demonstrating how popular he still is.
There’s always the risk of a curveball question — but a small risk indeed, compared with the much greater chance for a funny, touching or downright lump-in-the-throat moment, like when Obama hugged a homeless woman in Florida and promised to help.
But the White House seemed to stack the deck a bit at Obama’s last town hall in Virginia — where the White House picked the questions for Obama from those that were submitted online and through its social-networking sites.
And it scrapped a planned town hall in Michigan recently — changing it at the last minute to a speech rolling out a higher education initiative. But Obama will hold one Thursday in Ohio.
The major address
This brings out Obama’s inner professor — as he explains in sometimes painstaking detail his views on a particular topic.

When the president is pitching a big initiative, he gives many smaller speeches on the topic. The ideas in those remarks are then collectively brought to a crescendo in a “major address” — a soup-to-nuts explanation of his views.

Obama has done this on the economy, detainees and torture policy, Iraq and U.S. relations with the Muslim world, but not yet on health care — so stay tuned.

“He tests out his message before he does the big speech and then after they do their big speeches, they don’t let it drop because people’s attention span is very short,” said Gerald Rafshoon, former White House communications director for former President Jimmy Carter. “They follow through and cover all the bases.”

The major address gets plenty of media coverage in the days beforehand, and the White House believes the “closing argument” approach is a powerful way to put Obama’s message into political conversation. These lengthy speeches are heavy on detail, and their effectiveness is debatable. It’s unclear how much the public takes in, as most of these addresses are nearly an hour long and have been delivered in the middle of the day. 

The solo prime-time news conference

For Obama, the prime-time news conference is just another version of the town hall. Except reporters are the ones in the audience asking the questions, and because of the prime-time slot, it offers him an unfiltered hourlong slot. His message goes directly to viewers at home.

“It’s not like going to doing something during the day, and it gets edited for the evening news,” Rafshoon said. “He is getting through the filter. ... He can give it as long an answer as he wants, and they don’t cut away from it. They don’t edit it.”

Like the town hall, Obama gets to deliver an opening statement laying out his message. The topics of questions are usually predictable. It’s generally a cordial atmosphere, so even if the questions are tough, reporters only push so far and Obama gets to monopolize the time.

But, also like the town hall, the White House recently received criticism after an Obama news conference for suggesting ahead of time to a Huffington Post reporter that he would possibly get to ask the president a question about Iran.

Interviews, interviews, interviews

Obama has given more interviews than any recent president at this point in his term, according to a tally kept by veteran White House historian Martha Joynt Kumar.

Obama does the obvious: doling out different types of exclusives to the three networks and bringing cable into the fold, as he did in Africa with a one-on-one with CNN’s Anderson Cooper.

But he also regularly sits for round-table interviews with regional reporters. He often speaks to foreign news outlets before arriving abroad to set the tone, and he courts specialty media, such as the Hispanic and black press.

The interview-palooza works because Obama is the star and he does not go off message. Plus, regional and foreign news media tend to be softer interviews and give better play than members of the White House press corps.

“It’s more of a softball,” said Greg Jenkins, the Bush White House’s director of advance. “For anybody who doesn’t get a crack at the president every day of the week, you’re like, ‘Oh, wow, OK. I’ll ask my question and listen to what he says and move on.’ ... You tend to get more traction out of those interviews.”

The personal note

Part of Obama’s broad appeal is his youth and perceived coolness. As president, he tries to maintain his street cred as a regular guy, husband and dad.

Obama usually infuses some type of pop culture element into his communications smorgasbord. The White House has leaned heavily on a variety of websites — streaming video of the Foo Fighters show on the South Lawn on whitehouse.gov and popping up websites for the recovery act, health reform and other specific initiatives.

During the stimulus debate, Obama paused to chat with ESPN and often peppers his interviews with tidbits about family life in the White House — both prompted and unprompted. He routinely ignores shouted questions when in earshot of his press corps but has responded to weigh in on the NBA finals and make a quip about the first dog, Bo.

Obama has also twice written intimate pieces for Parade magazine — no Professor Obama here, pitching policy prescriptions. The first was a letter to his daughters just before his Inauguration, and the second an essay for Father’s Day.

Read More Stories from POLITICOObama agenda gets a lift with F-22 winDems use GOP to rally on health carePOTUS WednesdayReid blasts GOP for opposing planFlight 44: A little turbulence folks?

Obama in all-out push for US health reform (AFP)

WASHINGTON (AFP) –
US President Barack Obama holds a primetime news conference Wednesday to tout the health care reform he promised during his campaign for the White House, as new polls reveal his popularity is waning.

Six months after his January inauguration attracted record crowds and television audiences, Obama's approval rating has dropped nine points to 55 percent, a USA Today/Gallup poll found this week, as his disapproval rating jumped 16 points to 41 percent.

Critically for the high-stakes efforts over health care reform -- on which Obama is pushing for immediate legislative action -- the poll found the US public disapprove of his health care policy by 50 percent to 44 percent.

Obama's handling of the economy appears to be key in his fading popularity, as Americans have become more pessimistic about how long it will take the economic downturn to end.

Health care reform however, when coupled with mounting deficits from efforts to battle the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s and ever-rising unemployment, looks set to be Obama's biggest test yet.

He has invested much personally in the campaign, a cornerstone of his 2008 White House race that saw him defeat Republican rival John McCain to become the country's first African-American president.

But his far-reaching plans to afford health insurance for all Americans have left many worrying who will end up footing the bill.

During the press conference, only the fourth in primetime since his presidency began, Obama hopes to sway not only the public on radical reform but also many players within his own Democratic party, who are yet to be won over.

When Obama in February unveiled massive plans to stimulate the world's largest economy and create or save some three million jobs within two years, he was met by a wave of skepticism among Republican critics who accused him of aggravating the deficit, burdening generations to come with a huge debt.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs meanwhile admitted Tuesday that due to the recession-mired economy, with its smaller tax base, the government's budget challenges "have only become greater."

As such, it is more than anything else the final cost that may eventually scupper plans for the health care system -- one of the most expensive and least performing among the world's industrialized nations.

But Obama is determined to get his message across, and has fought back hard to keep it on track.

"Just the other day, one Republican senator said -- and I'm quoting him now -- 'If we're able to stop Obama on this, it will be his Waterloo. It will break him,'" Obama said on Monday.

"This isn't about me. This isn't about politics. This is about a health care system that is breaking America's families, breaking America's businesses, and breaking America's economy."

In an opinion column in the Wall Street Journal, first published online late Tuesday, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal -- a potential Republican candidate to challenge Obama in years to come -- slammed the president for his efforts.

The "Democrats' reforms are designed to push an ever-increasing number of Americans into a government-run health care plan," Jindal wrote, saying authorities would compete "unfairly in the marketplace until private plans are driven out of business."

The result, Jindal warned, would be higher costs for all Americans accompanied by an inevitable fall in health care quality.

Longest 21st century solar eclipse wows millions (Reuters)

VARANASI, India/WUHAN, China (Reuters) –
A total solar eclipse began its flight on Wednesday across a narrow swathe of Asia, where hundreds of millions of people watched the skies darken despite thick summer clouds.

The longest total solar eclipse of the 21st century was visible along a roughly 250 km-wide (155 miles) corridor, according to the U.S. space agency NASA, as it traveled half the globe and passed through the world's two most populous nations, India and China.

Thousands of people snaked through the narrow lanes of the ancient Hindu holy city of Varanasi and gathered for a dip in the Ganges, an act considered as leading to salvation from the cycle of life and death.

Amid chanting of Hindu hymns, men, women and children waded into the river with folded hands and prayed to the sun as it emerged in an overcast sky.

"We have come here because our elders told us this is the best time to improve our after-life," said Bhailal Sharma, a villager from central India who came to Varanasi with a group of about 100 people.

The eclipse then swept through Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar and over the crowded cities along China's Yangtze River, before heading to the Pacific.

Crowds gathered along the high dykes of Wuhan, an industrial city in central China, roared and waved goodbye as the last sliver of sun disappeared, plunging the city into darkness.

"As soon as the totality happened, the clouds closed in so we couldn't see the corona. That's a pity," said Zhen Jun, a man whose work unit had given the day off for the spectacle.

But eclipse viewers in central China was luckier than those in the coastal cities near Shanghai, where overcast skies and rain in some places blocked the view of the sun entirely.

LONGEST THIS CENTURY

Eclipses allow earth-bound scientists a rare glimpse at the sun's corona, the gases surrounding the sun.

"In the 21st century this is the longest," said Harish Bhatt, dean at the Bangalore-based Indian Institute of Astrophysics.

"This is indeed quite an important event for scientific experiments. Its long duration provides you an opportunity to make very complicated, complex experiments."

Scientists in China planned to snap two-dimensional images of the sun's corona -- up to 2 million degrees Celsius (3.6 million F) hot -- at roughly one image per second, Bhatt said.

The eclipse lasted up to a maximum of 6 minutes, 39 seconds over the Pacific Ocean, according to NASA.

The eclipse is seen as a mixed blessing for millions of Indians. Those who considered it auspicious bathed in holy rivers and ponds for good fortune during the solar blackout.

But astrologers predicted the eclipse spelled bad luck for others. Expectant mothers asked doctors to advance or postpone births to avoid complications or a miserable future for their children.

Parents in several schools in India's capital, New Delhi, kept their children home from classes since the eclipse coincided with breakfast. According to Hindu custom, it is inauspicious to prepare food during an eclipse.

In ancient Chinese culture, an eclipse was an omen linked to natural disasters or deaths in the imperial family. Chinese officials and state media were at pains to reassure the public that city services would run normally.

"We heard about it on television last night," said Qian Qiangguo, speaking in a thick Wuhan accent.

In modern China, people who wished to see the astronomical rarity clearly tried to escape thick pollution caused by the rapid industrial growth, avoiding cities where smog smudges the horizon, even on clear days.

"The majority of people decided to go to Tongning, in Anhui, because they're worried about the serious air pollution from industrial areas in Shanghai," said Bill Yeung, the president of the Hong Kong Astronomical Society, who organized 120 eclipse chasers from Hong Kong.

Those who chose Shanghai ended up fleeing to inland cities to escape the clouds, he added.

(Additional reporting by Matthias Williams, Bappa Majumdar and James Pomfret; Writing by Matthias Williams and Lucy Hornby; Editing by Alex Richardson)

Democrats unsure Obama health care deadline can be met (McClatchy Newspapers)

WASHINGTON — Despite President Barack Obama's push for the Senate and the House of Representatives to approve their health care overhauls by early August, Democratic leaders expressed doubts Tuesday that they can meet the deadline.

While he wants to pass legislation by the time the Senate leaves Aug. 7 for a recess, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid , D- Nev. , said, "The goal is not deadlines; the goal is comprehensive health care reform. Not piecemeal health care reform, comprehensive health care reform."

House Democratic leaders were wary about the prospects for consensus before leaving July 31 for a lengthy summer recess.

"I don't think staying in session is necessarily necessary to continue to work on getting consensus," said House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer , D- Md.

Democrats weren't rejecting the deadline outright, but they were coming close.

"No one wants to tell the speaker ( Nancy Pelosi ) that she's moving too fast, and they damn sure don't want to tell the president," said House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles Rangel , D- N.Y.

Obama said last week that while Congress had made progress, he hoped it would "provide the urgency for both the House and the Senate to finish their critical work on health reform before the August recess." Monday, he told PBS's Jim Lehrer that he thought the House and Senate would pass the legislation by the recess.

The president has been holding public events daily this week and meeting with key members of Congress . He'll have a prime-time news conference at 8 p.m. Wednesday , at which the issue is expected to dominate.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said Tuesday that while "there are some" who'd asked for "different timetables," Obama's response was that "we can't afford to delay this."

A number of factors are slowing it down, however, including disagreements among Democrats and a Republican offensive that worries some Democrats

Blue Dog Democrats — about 50 fiscally conservative, centrist House Democrats — say not enough is being done to cut health care costs. They worry that many proposals from fellow Democrats could hurt businesses because of a fee on employers who don't provide health insurance.

They also object to basing a government-provided plan on the Medicare payment system, which they say adversely affects their rural districts.

Hoyer said the problems were "not just Blue Dogs," adding, "I want to make it very clear that there's progressives, Blue Dogs and everybody in between who have expressed concerns, and we're working on that."

Republican leaders have been relentless in painting the Democrats' efforts as rushed and expensive, since virtually every serious plan that includes a government-run program would raise some kind of taxes.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell , R- Ky. , on Tuesday made his 24th Senate speech on the subject since June 1 . He sounded what's become a familiar refrain.

"Americans don't want a government takeover, and they certainly don't want the government to spend trillions of their tax dollars to pay for it," he said, "especially if the care they end up with is worse than the care they already receive, and especially if the money that's spent on these so-called reforms only adds to the national debt."

Some Republicans have been less gentle. In a conference call with conservative activists last week, Sen. Jim DeMint , R- S.C. , said, "If we're able to stop Obama on this, it will be his Waterloo. It will break him."

Democrats hoped to use that kind of talk — which McConnell has tried to calm by saying "this is not about winning or losing a political campaign" — as a rallying point.

Organizing for America, an effort that promotes Obama's initiatives, sent an e-mail to supporters Tuesday reciting the DeMint quote and urging people to "fight back against this disastrous brand of old-style politics."

Reid used most of a news conference Tuesday to denounce such remarks, then listed the ways Democrats had made progress.

The Senate Health Committee approved its version last week, and the Finance Committee is working on its plan. Finance's decisions are regarded as crucial, since three Republicans are working with Democrats.

Members said, however, that they wouldn't be pushed by any deadline.

Asked whether White House pressure was having much effect, Sen. Kent Conrad , D- N.D. , said, "No. You can see what we're doing is working very methodically. We are going through this in a very careful, determined way."

The committee hopes to begin formally writing the bill Saturday, which could take several days. If it's approved, the full Senate then would consider it.

Since unlimited amendments are likely, however, and it takes 60 votes to overcome procedural hurdles, it appears unlikely that the Senate can act by its recess, especially since it expects to spend about four days considering the nomination of Supreme Court hopeful Sonia Sotomayor .

( Steven Thomma contributed to this article.)

MORE FROM MCCLATCHY

Obama moves to reassure doubters on health plan's cost

Conservative Democrats threaten to block health bill

What kind of health care do lawmakers and Obama get?

For more McClatchy politics coverage visit Planet Washington

Resigning British minister joins Afghan troop row (AFP)

LONDON (AFP) –
Britain's resigning junior foreign minister said Wednesday more helicopters were needed in Afghanistan, piling pressure on Prime Minister Gordon Brown amid a row over adequate resources for troops.

Lord Mark Malloch-Brown also told the Daily Telegraph the British public had not been properly warned about the current offensive against Taliban militants in Afghanistan's Helmand province, before a recent rise in troop deaths.

Malloch-Brown, whose responsibilities as a Foreign Office minister include Afghanistan, announced this month he was resigning from the government for family and personal persons at the end of this week.

"We definitely don?t have enough helicopters. When you have these modern operations and insurgent strikes what you need, above all else, is mobility," Malloch-Brown said in an interview with the newspaper.

The comments are a fresh blow for Brown who has faced criticism from the main opposition Conservatives that his government is denying troops vital resources amid a surge in troop deaths in recent weeks.

British soldiers serving in Afghanistan suffered their blackest day earlier this month, with eight troops dying within 24 hours.

Since operations against the Taliban extremists began in October 2001, 187 British troops have been killed, more than the total number in Iraq.

Senior military figures including army chief General Richard Dannatt have called for more troops and equipment for the seven-year-old conflict, which was stepped up last month with the new push in Helmand.

Britain's recently-resigned defence secretary also added his voice last week to calls for more support for troops.

Finance minister Alistair Darling insisted that the Treasury has not turned down requests from army commanders for more troops or equipment in Afghanistan.

"The army has said this is what we want in terms of troops and equipment and we have provided that and financed it," Darling said in an interview with left-wing weekly Tribune magazine.

Malloch-Brown, a former deputy secretary general of the UN, told the Daily Telegraph he took partial responsibility for not properly informing the public about the latest offensive.

"We didn?t do a good job a month ago of warning the British public that we and the Americans were going on the offensive in Helmand. This is a new operation; the whole purpose is to win control. These deaths have happened ... after we chose to go on the offensive," he said.

The recent loss of life has pushed the Afghan conflict to the top of the political agenda ahead of a general election which must be held by June 2010.

Malloch-Brown refused to write off Brown's chances of leading the ruling Labour Party to victory but added: "It looks incredibly bleak."

Asked if he believed Brown thought he could lose, he said: "No, I don?t. That?s one reason why, for all the criticism, he?s a remarkable leader. He has this almost Churchillian faith in his belief that he can persuade the British public he?s the one."